Aleksander Chayka vs Jannik Opitz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do recent second serve performances compare? Opitz has a slightly better second serve point win rate at 44.02% compared to Chayka's 42.56%.
• Who excels in returning the opponent's serve? Chayka outperforms Opitz in return game stats, winning 46.88% of second serve returns and 26.99% of first serve returns, compared to Opitz's 41.6% and 24.48% respectively.
• How do players handle pressure? Opitz has saved 59.42% of breakpoints, showing better performance under pressure than Chayka's 49.48%.
• Who has had a better overall performance lately? Opitz has won 60.87% of matches over the last year, whereas Chayka has a win rate of 50%.
• Is surface preference an advantage for either player? Opitz performs best on hard courts with a 68% win record, whereas Chayka's best surface is indoor hard, but he struggles on hard courts with only a 43% win rate.
• Regarding the level of play, Opitz has had more success in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a win rate of 63.64%, compared to Chayka's 50%.
• Who has faced tougher opponents? Chayka has faced players with an average rank of 242.87, indicating tougher competition compared to Opitz, whose opponents have an average rank of 330.96.
• Deciding set performance gives Opitz an edge, winning 67% of deciding sets in the past year, compared to Chayka's 44%.
• Chayka has a higher breakpoint conversion rate at 36.23%, compared to Opitz's 25%, crucial for live betting predictions.

Editorial Prediction (September 3, 2025, UTC):

In assessing the head-to-head potential between these two players, several performance indicators stand out. Opitz holds a slight advantage in second serve performance and demonstrates better composure under pressure, saving a higher percentage of breakpoints. His stronger overall match win rate over the past year, combined with a better record in deciding sets, adds to his edge in this matchup.

Chayka, on the other hand, shows superior return stats, particularly against second serves, and has faced tougher opponents, which might indicate a higher level of resilience and experience in challenging matches. His conversion of breakpoints is also notably higher, which could be a critical factor during play.

While both players have areas of potential strength, Opitz's more consistent results and better adaptation under pressure suggest he may have the upper hand going into this match. Considering all factors, Opitz appears to be the likelier candidate to emerge victorious in this upcoming encounter.